Archive for the ‘ campaigns ’ Category

Five Things We Can Learn From Elizabeth Colbert-Busch

Thursday, May 9th, 2013

Courtesy to Google Images

Courtesy to Google Images

The race was anticipated by many nationwide and was watched by millions. Former South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford and Elizabeth Colbert-Busch duked it out in South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District race and as people thought, Colbert-Busch would win.

Wrong.

 On May 7, 2013 Sanford won the Congressional race and shocked  America. Although the 1st district is red and very conservative, many were surprised that Sanford won.

Although Colbert-Busch lost the race, that does not mean there is nothing to learn from the race, and specifically Colbert-Busch. There are few things we should learn and remember about her:

 1. She just ran.

By just looking at Colbert-Busch, you can tell she is independent, strong-willed and a free thinker. Those traits brought her far and made her the Democratic nominee for the race. And honestly, you could tell nothing was holding her back. She just ran. She wanted to make a difference for South Carolinian’s and the 1st district. No need to remind her of how awesome she is, she already is aware.

 2. She kept going.

This was a vigorous race and quite tiring, at that. No matter what popped up, she kept on going. Nothing could stop her. From campaign stop to campaign stop, she kept talking to voters about herself and what she would do to help the district. It’s difficult to keep going, and she did beyond the work that is probably required. Go Elizabeth!

3. “My name is Elizabeth Colbert Busch, and nobody tells me what to do except the people of the first district.”

She is a hell of a debater. FINALLY, someone put Sanford in his place. Sanford kept name dropping Nancy Pelosi in the race and compared Colbert-Busch to Pelosi often. Even once at a campaign stop, he brought a Nancy Pelosi cardboard cut-out. Obviously someone was confused about who they were running against. Colbert-Busch must have noticed his numerous name drops of Pelosi and was tired of hearing him mentioning Pelosi’s name, so she addressed the issue at a debate. That is right, Colbert-Busch has got a hold of this.

 4. The campaign used social media to their advantage.

From Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, the campaign knew how to work social media and used it to get out the word about the campaign. They posted pictures and videos, information about campaign stops and even responded to fans. Yes, they follow me on my personal Twitter. And yes, I squealed when I saw they followed me. But, in all seriousness, the campaign was on top of the game with their knowledge of networking. Very impressive, Team Colbert-Busch.

 5. She is an average American who ran for Congress.

SHOCKING. No, really, I am being serious. Often people who run for Congress have held previous offices and have name recognition. Did she? Mmm, nope. Well, except for her brother being Stephen Colbert, she was not a name known many up until now. It is great to have a variety of people running for office and for different perspectives to be heard.  Don’t worry, Colbert-Busch knew she would rock the “I’m average and I know it” vote.

Elizabeth Colbert-Bush lost the Congressional race for South Carolina’s 1st District, but the race will definitely be remembered. She shook up South Carolina politics and ran because all she wanted was to change the district, which is pretty rare nowadays. Who knows, maybe we will see her face appear in politics again. Let’s keep our fingers crossed because she was a phenomenal candidate and this was an exciting race. She was not afraid to tell it how it is, be bold in her actions and ran to be a voice for the people of South Carolina.

I really do wish more people were Elizabeth Colbert-Busch.

Thank you, EMILY’s List

Monday, May 6th, 2013

Courtesy to Google Images

Courtesy to Google Images

 I remember staring at the television in my living room. My parents would turn on the news and I would be fascinated with the world. I would watch President George W. Bush address the country and answer questions from the press. I would be impressed at how much work people who lead the country did and how they did it. After seeing how much one could change the world, I was determined to make a difference in this country and run for President someday. I was 4 years old.

Today, I’m 15 and a freshman in high school. I earn good grades and I’m diligent about my work. I’m in band and I play the French Horn. I participate in my school’s speech team and I do extemporaneous speaking. I’m President of my school’s GSA (Gay-Straight Alliance). I run a website with my lovely co-director, State Rep. Stacey Newman and write about progressive values, ideals and feminism. And today, I’m an aspiring Congresswoman.

I have made it so far from that tiny 4 year old with big dreams to become President someday. From memorizing all of the United States Presidents (in order, may I add) and being a history buff, from figuring out which political party I am and changing my stances on many different issues and to learning how politics truly works, I’ve learned many valuable lessons along this 11 year journey. I still have so much more to learn. The great thing about it is that I already have a head start.

There are a variety of different organizations across the country trying to reach out to women, especially young women, encouraging us to run for office. From national organizations like EMILY’s List and Emerge America and to organizations that are formed state-by-state, like Annie’s List, Sally’s List, Ignite CA and the newly formed Close the Gap CA, these organizations push women who are willing to run for office to get out there and embrace their true talent.

All of these organizations do fabulous work for women, but, let’s put the spotlight on EMILY’s List for a moment. The highly successful women’s organization that was formed in 1986 that endorses pro-choice women for office has just launched a campaign called “Madam President”, which is aimed at getting a woman in the White House. Do you need me to be more specific? A Democratic, pro-choice woman.

Yesssssss.

Along with the launch, EMILY’s List has released a video to promote the national campaign. The video (below) features young girls sharing why they want a woman President and the benefits of having a woman in the White House.

Click to watch the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Y2-zpi-RWhQ

May we just take a moment to thank EMILY’s List and appreciate what they are doing? No, not just trying to get a woman in the White House, but featuring a few young girls talking about wanting to be President and what it would mean to them to have a woman be President in their life time. Young girls like the ones in the video are the future and already have a head start in political knowledge.

Instead of making fun of young girls who want a woman to represent the country and telling them that their dream is unrealistic, like I have been told over the years, EMILY’s List encourages young girls to reach for their dreams and make them possible. Finally, it looks as if there is hope for young girls to be interested in history when they are little, want to be in Congress when they’re a teenager or for Hillary Clinton to be their role model without being looked at funny or judged.

So, thanks EMILY’s List. You rock.

Gillibrand in 2016?

Thursday, May 2nd, 2013

 

Courtesy to Truth Dig

Courtesy to Truth Dig

The junior Senator from New York has many supporters nation wide. From her program, “Off the Sidelines” which supports women getting involved in politics, to being a well accomplished woman and Senator, there is no doubt that she could be planning to run for President in 2016.

“I find her to be very impressive,” said Howard Dean. “She often underwhelms people at first sight, [but] when you look under the hood, you find a first-class political mind and someone who has a great deal of skill.”

Do you think Gillibrand will run?

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html#ixzz2S6Ifp0RH

THE OTHER WOMEN…WILL WE NEED THEM?

Tuesday, April 16th, 2013

THE FOLLOWING IS WRITTEN BY ONE OF MY FAVORITE MENTEES, A SERIOUS CAMPAIGN PRO & VOLUNTEER FROM MY CAMPAIGNS:

By Ellie Cohen, 2013 political journalism George Washington University graduate-to-be,  for TheRun2016.com 

courtesy of www.ojuaraxd.com

courtesy of www.ojuaraxd.com

 A pair of recent public speeches  that tickled the fancy of the media and her admirers only hardened the assumption that Hillary Clinton is running for president.

“It’s such a silly question. Of course Hillary is running,” declared the inimitable New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd on Sunday.

But if — for whatever reason — she takes a pass at history, the decision would blow open a gaping hole in the 2016 Democratic field that would have to be filled.

Unquestionably, there would be a need for another woman.

There are a handful of prominent names that have been floated as women who could pick up the torch, but Democratic strategists surveyed by The RUN believe two stand out head-and-shoulders above the pack: New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

“Gillibrand and Warren would be far more formidable,” said Democratic strategist David Heller, when presented with those names as well as Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.

“Elizabeth Warren, in particular, would be extremely formidable because she has, arguably, the best donor list of any sitting office holder right now, other than Joe Biden. In terms of the presidency, only Biden and Hillary Clinton would have a better donor base to begin the race than Elizabeth Warren.”

During the high-profile Massachusetts Senate race last year, Warren compiled an extensive and active donor list and demonstrated her prolific national fundraising abilities. She raised $42 million leading up to November, with more money and individual donors than any other congressional candidate.

Running in the national spotlight also helped boost her name recognition, especially in the neighboring state of New Hampshire, which shares a media market with Boston. Public Policy Polling recently found that if Clinton and Biden are both running, only five percent would vote for Warren.

However, when Clinton is not in the contender pool, the number more than doubles to 11 percent. If Biden is removed from the field of contenders, 18 percent said they would vote for Warren, following unknown and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

READ MORE OF HER ARTICLE HERE.

Change is in the Air: Young Women in the Democratic Party

Sunday, April 14th, 2013

Courtesy to Google Images

Courtesy to Google Images

“Be the change you want to see in the world.”

We are teenagers. We like to hang out with friends and have sleepovers. We go to parties. We try new things and meet new people. While we are focused on keeping our grades up, having a social life and finding our place in the world, there is one thing missing: Most of us could care less about our country’s future. Most of us do not know what Congress is, do not know what each political party stand for and have never heard of influential women like Kirsten Gillibrand or Nancy Pelosi. The basic knowledge of a teenager extends to who the President is and a few simple duties a President holds. Not only do we lack interest in the world around us, but we lack ambition. We do not strive to change the country politically. Why? We are not motivated.

Us young women will see successful women politicians in the media, such as Hillary Clinton, and notice how much work they are doing for this country. Rarely do young women think to themselves, “I will do what she does when I’m an adult”. Most of us will either see the work that these accomplished women do and appreciate it, or ignore it as a whole, rather than telling ourselves that we can follow in their footsteps and make major changes, like they have, in our country.

The majority of young women in the United States seem to act as if change will happen by a person who is motivated and assume change will occur automatically with no effort put in to it. Young women have to start realizing that change happens by everyday people that want to help this country and make it a better place to reside in. Anyone can make change, but it only happens if one sets their mind to the possibilities.

In the world of politics, many aspects need to be fixed, especially when dealing with issues pertaining to women. The attacks on women’s health needs to diminish. Sexism needs to stop occurring. More Democratic women need to be elected to move this country forward. Little girls and young women need role models to look up to and so we strive to start setting goals for ourselves. We have so much to work on as a country. But, where do we start? How do we motivate young women to notice how much needs to be changed in this country? It is not going to be a simple, step-by-step process, but it is possible.

To start with, we have to be aware of the alarming statistics about women in politics in the United States. Our gender is not represented equally in political offices, including the number of women that are Governors, Congress members, Cabinet members, etc. To be even more specific, Democratic women are not represented equally in these offices. As the Democratic Party is in the majority nationwide, women are still in the minority regarding these offices. Women currently make up nineteen percent of Congress as a whole, and in the Senate, there are only twenty women Senators, fifteen of which are Democrats. Regarding how many women are Governors, there are four. Out of the four, there is only one Democratic Governor, Maggie Hassan from New Hampshire.

To change the current statistics of women and our involvement in politics, we have to show women of current generations and the next generations to come how important it is to change the world and to make change that is possible for each individual. For women that want to change the world, they find it easiest to do so by running for office. According to CAWP Rutgers (http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/research/reports/PoisedtoRun.pdf), about one-third of women say that someone tried to discourage them from running, most often an officeholder or political party official. When women from my generation have the chance to run for office, it is important that we are not discouraged to run, because we have so much to offer. We bring diversity to the table, we have new voices that need to be heard and we understand what our generations is at stake for. If we want to make change politically, we have to get involved, specifically in the Democratic Party. The party represents our best interests, including making decisions about our own body and health, advocating for equality when dealing with the LGBTQ community, caring about our environment and creating effective plans for our economy. As many young people, including young women, that participate in the political process are Democrats, not enough young women are involved to make an impacting difference on our country through the party. Seeing a Senator make a difference is wonderful, but following in her footsteps is even better. We have to aspire to make change, but not necessarily be an exact replica of the one’s who inspire us. We have to make our own lives for ourselves and our own changes that are possible for us personally.

Not only will showing young women how important it is to get motivated and to change the current statistics of women in politics, but treating women equally in the media makes more women comfortable of being in the spotlight. Often times when women run for office, the media will focus on aspects of the woman that is irrelevant to her credentials. A perfect example is when Hillary Clinton ran for President in 2008 for the Democratic nomination. From her hair to her colorful pant suits, it seems all the media cared about was her appearance rather than what she had to say. This arouse the topic of what is appropriate to talk about when discussing politicians and candidates when they are running for office or in office. Even in 2013, the media still focuses on appearance, but we are making progress. Thanks to social media, Americans can call out sexism so much easier than before, simply with just a tweet or Facebook status. When the media focuses strictly on someone’s appearance rather than the issues, media sources are called out for focusing on something very irrelevant to the discussion and can influence the certain media sources to talk about more appropriate aspects of the politician or candidate. We still have much work to do, but we’re getting closer to diminishing this type of demeaning sexism.

Finally, to get more young women motivated and showing them the benefits of the political process when wanting to make change, the women from older generations need to value my generation’s opinions and our stances. As many older women openly support my generation and our involvement, some do not have faith in us. They rather think of us as a “failed generation”, who rejected the idea of continuing the equality movements, that we are the women do not appreciate their hard work they endured, and that we are all okay with an average lifestyle. While many young women are very uneducated on the older generation’s work and all they did to assist us, once we motivate and educate young women, more of my generation will be proud and appreciate the difficult work that these older women did. An uneducated generation can make no progress. Education is vital in motivation and when a generation wants to be valued.

From programs like Running Start and movements like Off the Sidelines, to women like Hillary Clinton, Kirsten Gillibrand and Nancy Pelosi, motivation, equality and the value of young voices is vital to having more young women involved in the political process and making a difference in our country. More Democratic women need to get elected to stand up for important issues, especially issues dealing with women’s health, the economy, the environment, civil rights, etc. Starting the process of involvement is not simple and will take a while at the rate we are at in the United States, but it is certainly possible. Although one cannot force young women to get involved, inspiring, motivating and showing my generation how vital it is to make change in this country, will send the message across to all of us. We have to know that change is not automatic and is made by everyday people. From professions like teachers, actresses, politicians and business owners, people do make political change often, whether it is election time or it is just simple as endorsing a piece of legislation. The time to get involved is NOW.

So, what are you waiting for? There is a country out there that needs your help, and you’re living in that country.

A Woman’s Appearance is NOT a Measure of Her Credibility – Get it?

Wednesday, April 10th, 2013

THANKS TO MSPRESENTATION FOR THIS.  AND YES, IT DOES HURT US WOMEN WHEN WE RUN FOR OFFICE.  JUST TALK ABOUT OUR QUALIFICATIONS AND OUR EXPERTISE, OK?  AND…OH YES, WHAT WE’RE WEARING IS NOT IMPORTANT EITHER.

courtesy of triblocal.com

courtesy of triblocal.com

In the wake of President Barack Obama apologizing to California Attorney General Kamala Harris for complimenting her on her good looks comes this blockbuster finding from a new study: when it comes to a female candidate, any media coverage about her appearance–even positive–hurts her with voters.By Lynn Sweet of the Chicago Sun Times

That’s a key conclusion of the poll for the Women’s Media Center and She Should Run, to be released Monday in Chicago at the Council on Foundations annual conference at the Hilton Chicago, 720 S. Michigan.

The survey’s release is timely because Obama’s remark about Harris is the latest in the long-running struggle of women seeking public office, not to have their looks influence how people assess their credibility.

Obama apologized Friday for saying, during a Thursday fund-raiser for the Democratic National Committee near San Francisco  that Harris is “brilliant,” “dedicated” and “tough.”  What Obama said after that is what got him in trouble: “She also happens to be, by far, the best-looking attorney general.”

The “Name It. Change It” survey, conducted by Celinda Lake of Lake Research and Robert Carpenter of Chesapeake Beach Consulting found that when any media coverage focuses on a female contender’s appearance–positive, negative, or neutral–”it made voters less likely to vote for her.”

Lake said, “Women candidates pay a real price when they are covered in a way that focuses on their appearance. “Even what we thought was benign coverage about how a woman dresses has a negative impact on her vote and whether voters perceive her as in touch, likeable, confident, effective, and qualified.  And, in close races, sexist coverage on top of the attacks that every candidate faces can make the difference between winning and losing.”

Harris through her spokesman shrugged off the Obama comment, an option an incumbent and Obama loyalist–not in an election battle–can easily take.

“When a woman candidate’s looks become part of the election story, she loses ground,” said Julie Burton, President of the Women’s Media Center.

The on-line survey was conducted March 3-7 of 1,500 likely voters, with an oversample of women between the ages of 18-35.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2013/04/blockbuster_female_candidates_.html

« Older Entries

Top of page